Tuesday, May 29, 2012

The man discovered and is infected with third liver blood transfusion in 15 It is difficult to be rejected to go to court and put to the proof

The man discovered and is infected with third liver blood transfusion in 15 It is difficult to be rejected to go to court and put to the proof
The man discovered and is infected with third liver blood transfusion in 15 It is difficult to be rejected to go to court and put to the proof
Recently, (Jiangsu) The north court of pool district of Wuxi concludes the dispute of medical compensation for damage, reject one requirement hospital of plaintiff's money and claims that the blood station compensates for it in judgement. Gave a birth and moved in the hospital in because the money emblem on May 15, 1990, is expert at 200 ml of blood transfusion in caesarean birth skill, leave hospital on the 25th of same month. From July 31 of the same year to August 9, because had a fever, suffered from diarrhoea to six times of three courtyard clinic, case history was recorded: Diagnose as enteritis four times, diagnose as myocarditis sequela, check liver work, hepatitis two half-and-half in once study that during this time once, the inspection result is normal for liver function. On November 3, 1992, the county people's hospital of Wuxi lived because of herpes zoster in the money emblem, it is normal to check liver function biochemistry, B exceed and point out the spleen of liver and has not seen that obviously take pathological change in the location. Will it be October 15 2005, money emblem because gullet variceal to break, bleed, move in this city hospital, through checking, the liver antibody of money emblem third is positive, liver cirrhosis after diagnose as hepatitis. Plaintiff the intersection of money and emblem tell, claim its during giving a birth and is in hospital, input into blood station, offer behind the with third liver virus blood of hospital infecting, so that develops into liver cirrhosis by third liver, although there is no fault in hospital, blood station, should compensate for damage that it causes according to the fair principle, it is more than 13 ten thousand yuan altogether; Defendant hospital debates and claims, it offers for the fact that the blood that the money emblem is lost is the blood station, there is not evidence that prove in the fact that the money emblem advocates it infects time within 6 months after blood transfusion, also evidence does not prove the blood transfusion behavior and is infected and exist and is concerned with between third liver; The blood station debates and claims, the infection route multi-type of third liver, the money emblem does not have evidence that prove it infects third liver, and the blood transfusion of money emblem was in 1990, our country had not demanded to measure third liver while donating blood yet at that time. The judge who tries this case tells reporters, according to the stipulations of relevant judicial explanation, although money emblem 15 years later finds that infects third liver, so the money emblem should infect third liver and cause liver cirrhosis with having causality that is responsible for putting to the proof between blood transfusion on it, namely can judge, pay the bill third liver of emblem blood transfusion infect really clearly. According to the medical theory, blood transfusion is an important means to infect third liver, but not the only route, the intersection of money and diarrhoea, fevered symptom that emblem display can't it obtains their to be to infect with third the intersection of liver and clinical symptom that virus appear behind the blood transfusion. So reject the claims of the money emblem. (Village Lily If the road is foolish)


|

No comments:

Post a Comment