Use science and legal norm " Give up treating right "

Use science and legal norm " Give up treating right "
Use science and legal norm " Give up treating right "
Yu Zhang win according to the intersection of media and recent report, ends of the earth the intersection of forum and one the intersection of network and card claim one of Tianjin born, suffer from the intersection of anus and the intersection of person who close and baby girl of disease just, family give up treating and sending to her to the hospice, the volunteer succours to the doorstep, family insist on refusing to treat. The whole course cause net friend's great concern, and launch the great fierce debate that should be treated and cured in online live. According to the introduction of model, baby girl's congenital defect of closing etc. of suffering from the rectum and locking, occuring frequently Lou, kidney water accumulation, heart ovum hole when being born in, have accepted the treatment of 13 days in the hospital. It is too complicated and serious because of the condition, through after the discussions of more than 30 persons of the whole family, decide to give up treating, transfer baby girl to a old hospice. Therapeutic measure to have any, support one's family by a little ink only every day, hope she so walks silently. The experience of the baby girl, is affecting net friends' heart. Someone queries: " parents have no right to decide child's life and death by oneself " ; Some is understood: " it is a law of nature to select the superior and eliminate the inferior " . Rescue, can't should rescue rescue, focus that net friend debate fiercely lie in " accord with law " Whether, " contrary to ethics " . Cast aside the constraint of human nature and ethics, citizen giving up treating in certain circumstances, really cannot help but but not lack the second-class excellent choice of reason. On one hand, as to the thing that I one kind free, can reduce the torment of the illness; On the other hand, as to its families and whole societies, lightening psychologically too and materialist pressure. However, the citizen " gives up treating right" The necessary norm is exercised, I think, should be made authoritative adjudication by two respects. First, by the medical organization according to the condition, is it necessary to consult its guardian's opinion and make to treat and cure. Life of people should life-span take quality too, under treating and curing hopeless situation, in order to reduce the party's agony, can consult through the reason of medical organization and guardian, give up the therapeutic decision together. This not only can express the feelings of the flesh and blood that can't be forgotten can reflect helpless responsibility but also. Second, the judicial department makes the award according to suggestion and the guardian's request of the medical organization. Just as some countries agree to implement euthanasia in order to reduce patient's agony, can be through legislating to list in the legal category, this is likewise a kind of cultural and educational care of life quality to people. One kind likes being named going all out. When people sink into kindred and ethics difficult choice, the society should offer to parties in order to pass certain adjudication procedure, remove patient's power that the responsibility of the agony decides in all one's life.


|