Doubt that sets up shady deal that indicts Municipal Health Bureau

Doubt that sets up shady deal that indicts Municipal Health Bureau
Doubt that sets up shady deal that indicts Municipal Health Bureau
Information Times reports ' The intersection of reporter and intern of emblem emblem rich and gentle roof beam Wei) An attending physician of internal medicine department in Guangzhou applies for scientific research to set up, because evaluate the mark differs greatly, thinking to evaluate store in unjustly, suspect someone forges the expert " grade form " at the same time, then lodge a complaint against Guangzhou Municipal Health Bureau on the grounds of encroaching on legitimate interests and fair play right. This case opened a court session in second instance of the intermediate people's court of the market of Guangzhou in the morning of yesterday. It is the first doctor in charge of internal medicine department of the People's Hospital in Guangzhou to apply for scientific research and set up to unelected plaintiff doctor Zou. On January 20 last year, Municipal Health Bureau issued " notice on printing and distributing the scientific and technological project application guide of the medical and health of Guangzhou of 2009 " (call " notice " in the following texted) With " scientific and technological project management of the medical and health of Guangzhou " and relevant guide. The regulation among them " Generally guide the project " For subsidize all types of the intersection of health organ and vice high following the intersection of professional title and young and middle-aged medical personnel track the intersection of discipline and front,etc. in public health, clinical medicine, relevant field, research cycle was generally 2, it is about 200 items to plan to subsidize, subsidize 10,000 yuan each one. Will it be February the same year, doctor Zou write the intersection of scientific research and thesis according to the request of " notice ", select and recommend Municipal Health Bureau declare " guide project generally " . It is reported, this scientific research approves and initiates a project and declares and accords with the formal one and has 442 items in all. Because the group of doctor Zou's project has and joins and comments 54 projects, according to the above-mentioned regulation, so long as mark the first 31 items in proportion and can be set up. It is reported, not only there are research and related funds of subsidy after being selected, scientific research will be set up but also a condition that the professional title will be evaluated. On July 8, the websites of Municipal Health Bureau announced that evaluate the result, it is 318 fen that doctor Zou's project grades, because only rank the 36th and fail to be elected finally. Doctor Zou: Suspect that evaluates unjust doctor Zou thinks, it is the administrative behavior that Municipal Health Bureau prints and distributes " notice ", and it is that one forces sexual behavior to set up evaluation in scientific research, then forge expert's grade form with Municipal Health Bureau, encroached on its legitimate interests and fair play right, brought administrative litigation on September 21 last year, tell Municipal Health Bureau to show the district people's court. Propose that it determines to cancel the administration not offering the subsidy to the scientific research project at the same time, sentencing makes Municipal Health Bureau make the claims of the administrative decision again. Doctor Zou once reflected to the relevant department that set up and evaluated unjust situation in scientific research of Municipal Health Bureau. Municipal Health Bureau answers subsequently, claims the reason why doctor Zou's project fails to set up is not to accord with and set up and demand to mark the regulation which ranks the top 31, and enclose and conceal the " grade form " copy that 7 evaluation experts signed, plan to explain it is to join the evaluation result of commenting the expert that its project can't be selected. Health bureau: But doctor Zou's investigation by oneself subsequently that not bent on making the fake, find it in these copies, the score of what is two parts disagree with setting up has no expert to appraise through discussion. It has visited several among them and participated in the expert that it evaluated subsequently, but it does not express the table filled in in these 7 to interview the expert. It think someone " stealthily substitute one thing for another " the expert's " grade form " in the course of evaluating ,it and influence finally it is of evaluating result fairness, cause project of it not to be failed to be elected directly, letters and visits from the masses then again. Municipal Health Bureau answers and claims, " grade form " does not exist and bent on making the fake. This office shows and has not made the decision to subsidize this administrative behavior administratively its scientific research project, so think that it is incorrect to prosecute.


|