Short commentary: " tobacco academician "

Short commentary: " tobacco academician "
Short commentary: " tobacco academician "
At 9 o'clock a.m. on December 8, Chinese Academy of Engineering releases 54 newly-increased academician's lists to the outside formally. Only after the 1 hour, the intersection of academician and JianPing Xie name into " kill academician " on the net new the Jin Dynasty , " tobacco academician " ,This probably makes him unexpected. As the Vice President of research institute of tobacco of Zhengzhou of China Tobacco Corporation, Xie Jian's flat main direction is that the cigarette is " reduced and hurt and lowered burntly" Study. " Xie Jian's flat election is the shame of China's scientific circles and Chinese Academy of Engineering " ,The country accuses of cigarettes and does to director Yang GongHuan to point out, it is " false proposition " that the cigarette is reduced and hurt ,Not only it is impossible to realize, but also mislead the public, promote in a disguised form. The personage cracking down on the fake Fang Zhouzi thinks too, this research " deceives people and victimizes again " . (" Beijing Times " of December 12) This choice that face a difficult choice even if you study how subject lead leading in the world, but can't bring the benefit to ordinary people, what value is there? So the academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering evaluates, not only it depends on the advance of its subject for research, will see social value even more at the same time, if Hi-Tech just serves tobacco manufacturer, giving numerous smokers the false appearance, the academician that chooses like this can't convince people. So such an academician should elect " Think thrice before acting " . The people's health is important, whether or do tobacco enterprises increase the benefit important? This is not the choice of facing a difficult choice. --Yang YuMing ( Pharmacist) This does not need to study the public to generally think, in this " chaotic state in which corrupt practices prevail " It is to encourage smokers to smoke to make and study in the field in a disguised form, this not only wastes scientific research resources, unfavorable to the public and form the healthy habits and customs, accusing of the resolution of the cigarette with the country violates. As will be generally known with the masses, this does not need to study, " chaotic state in which corrupt practices prevail " The middle can not work out a stretch of blue sky really. In the words of ordinary people, does not this spoil the effect by adding what is superfluous and make unfounded countercharges? Must give up, how to save trouble! --Cheng KuiXing ( Citizens) It is isomorphism that public service and tobacco private interests this accuse of the cigarette predicament with China at present in scientific research. China it accuses of cigarettes to be difficult to lie in smoker to be all, lie in system to be special - -The tobacco industry merges government administration with enterprise management into one, State Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and China Tobacco Corporation " two brands, a set of groups " ,There are limitless entanglements and conflicts between cigarette obligation and trade interests to accuse of. " tobacco academician " It is just this miniature kind of antithesis contradiction on one's body, public service and smoke enterprise's private interests of scientific research are entangled with. So, in the face of such a " tobacco academician " ,Even if one a lot of scientific and technological civilian of accomplishment, can express one's own query loudly too. --Li XiaoLiang ( Citizens) " favourable member of a nationality " It is a basic standard evaluated, as the assessment of the academician of the highest academic title of China's science and technology, not only want, listen to opinion of expert, should listen attentively to more public opinions from independence, public beneficial favourable the people while being more perhaps. You know, " favourable member of a nationality " It should be one of the basic standards which the academician evaluate. --Zhang DongYang ( Citizens) The ones that are elected " The reason " It is engaged in that it is explained that should be clear originally there is no original sin in tobacco research, it is its inherent right too to participate in academician's assessment, but its reason selected, must tell the public. Since " all academicians vote, have its own reasons " ,He these then " The reason " Made known publicly, only " contribute " Attribute,it is difficult very it give up it is public doubt,it and it is proper when evaluating not to reflect. Whether fair for procedure justice and result when being doubted, no matter Xie JianPing or Zhang JianPing, there was not a difference finally. " tobacco academician " It is a true expression which is entangled with the will of the people. --Hall lucky big Der ' Staff member) Why is the we one query from always after know whether and then feel no matter query, support, all of us should review: Why are we always forced in the blind alley that feel after and then knowing? Just think, if the public approves the low and tarry harmfulness, be unmoved when academician Xie JianPing nominated? Are out-and-out old smokers still complacent? In author's view, so long as any research field should have a chance to elect academician to move ahead to the human development, the problem of the bad coin good coin does not exist. And instead of what our ignorance is shone upon examines oneself, should say even more it is the knowledge before the public is poisoned and bewitched and demonstrated that has not known that popularizes, society and scientific research personnel can't have no responsibility for this. --Zhu Feng ( Citizens)


|