Accord with " national standard " Be safe?

Accord with " national standard " Be safe?
Accord with " national standard " Be safe?
Recently, Swedish research institution claims, baby food of brand such as Nestle contain heavy metal arsenic, a small amount of arsenic will also increase and suffer from the cancer risk. Chinese disease accuses of the centre openly to report, the international food code committee has not stipulated arsenic and plumbous index with a limit on quantity to infant and pre-school children's cereal aid food, arsenic and lead content of this kind of product have not exceeded China's standard. (" The Beijing News " April 18) Since without international standard, use " national standard " Measurement; Since Nestle accords with " The national standard " ,Then prove Nestle qualified, this is logic that disease accuses of the centre. But the author wants to question even more: " national standard " Accord with the safety standard? The international food code committee has not presumed the rigid standard, does not represent that does not need the standard, let alone represent " The national standard " Must be safe. It is not the author that loves " Take it seriously " ,But really too amiable to stand up. The intersection of Swedish and the intersection of research institution and the intersection of infant and pre-school children and the intersection of cereal and the intersection of detection and arsenic, lead, maximum detection value of cadmium under auxiliary food in Nestle, compared with " national standard " Several several dozen even, but why household afford to fry these test result still, and we take things calmly? Is it that are foreigners too sensitive and too apt to make a fuss or we are too obtuse ignore the safe bottom line very much? " standard " It is not a rubber band, will not change because spaces are different both at home and abroad. Foreign consumers can not stand, must stand if domestic consumers are unreasonable, the food incident that our baby will not rise one after another at home far exceeds resisting ability of the foreign child. Since it is so, there is no harm in asking disease to accuse of centre's explaining, why others' 33ug/kg can not be stood, " national standard " Is 200ug/kg fairly qualified?


|